Will Brunei benefit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership?

Reading Time: 3 minutes
Arno Maierbrugger
By Arno Maierbrugger

Brunei will again stand in the limelight when the next talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the “trade accord of the 21st century”, as US president Barack Obama put it, will be held in Bandar Seri Begawan in late August, the 19th round of TPP negotiations.

Brunei, one of the countries that joined negotiations with the US early, will also welcome a delegation from Japan which now for the first time is joining the trade talks. Other countries involved are Australia, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.

The TPP is an ambitious project that wants to define a new trade axis across the Pacific and move away from the traditional trade streams between Europe and the US.

It aims to extend to all members common trade agreements to reduce distortions in the market caused by overlapping tariff treatments and other trade regulations.

Harmonising rules of origin, which determine where a product originates for the purposes of applying duties a complicated exercise in the era of frequent transhipment is planned to reduce transactions costs, a move especially beneficial in Southeast Asia, an important hub for global supply chains. The TPP could liberalise trade even further for all signatories and improve on the trade relationships already established.

However, these advantages must be weighed against some negative aspects or at least unanswered questions that have been repeatedly addressed by the public and advocacy groups, as well as politicians.

They are touching upon unified labour rights and labour standards and their enforcement, the nature of investment provisions for corporations in the light of environmental, consumer and other public interest policies, on future methods of public procurement under the TPP to ensure that taxpayers’ money is kept circulating in local economies, on access to affordable, generic medicines, as well as on compensation for agricultural industries and farmers (a huge issue in the negotiations with Japan, for example).

And Brunei? How would Brunei benefit from the TPP?

At first sight not overwhelmingly when we look at the facts. Brunei exports mainly oil and petroleum products, which account for more than 95 per cent of its total exports, and almost the half of it goes to Japan and other sizeable parts to South Korea and Australia. Brunei is not a significant source of oil for the US as it does not import any oil or related products from Brunei.

Therefore, a TPP membership for Brunei makes, at present, only economic sense when Japan joins the group. In terms of open access to TPP markets for Brunei companies other than oil businesses, especially small and medium enterprises might find it convenient in the future to be able to venture into other countries with no trade barriers or other obstacles. However, the current non-oil trade of Brunei is so vanishingly low that it will be hard to measure a positive effect of a TPP membership in the mid-term.

Do you think that Brunei’s membership in a future Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade zone will help Brunei to diversify its economy? Will the advantages outweigh some of the mentioned negative aspects? Let us know through Twitter: @insideinvestor

 

This comment is part of Inside Investor’s weekly column series in Brunei’s leading newspaper Brunei Times and is published every Monday.

brunei_times_logo

 

Do you like this post?
  • Fascinated
  • Happy
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Afraid

Reading Time: 3 minutes

By Arno Maierbrugger

Brunei will again stand in the limelight when the next talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the “trade accord of the 21st century”, as US president Barack Obama put it, will be held in Bandar Seri Begawan in late August, the 19th round of TPP negotiations.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Arno Maierbrugger
By Arno Maierbrugger

Brunei will again stand in the limelight when the next talks on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the “trade accord of the 21st century”, as US president Barack Obama put it, will be held in Bandar Seri Begawan in late August, the 19th round of TPP negotiations.

Brunei, one of the countries that joined negotiations with the US early, will also welcome a delegation from Japan which now for the first time is joining the trade talks. Other countries involved are Australia, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.

The TPP is an ambitious project that wants to define a new trade axis across the Pacific and move away from the traditional trade streams between Europe and the US.

It aims to extend to all members common trade agreements to reduce distortions in the market caused by overlapping tariff treatments and other trade regulations.

Harmonising rules of origin, which determine where a product originates for the purposes of applying duties a complicated exercise in the era of frequent transhipment is planned to reduce transactions costs, a move especially beneficial in Southeast Asia, an important hub for global supply chains. The TPP could liberalise trade even further for all signatories and improve on the trade relationships already established.

However, these advantages must be weighed against some negative aspects or at least unanswered questions that have been repeatedly addressed by the public and advocacy groups, as well as politicians.

They are touching upon unified labour rights and labour standards and their enforcement, the nature of investment provisions for corporations in the light of environmental, consumer and other public interest policies, on future methods of public procurement under the TPP to ensure that taxpayers’ money is kept circulating in local economies, on access to affordable, generic medicines, as well as on compensation for agricultural industries and farmers (a huge issue in the negotiations with Japan, for example).

And Brunei? How would Brunei benefit from the TPP?

At first sight not overwhelmingly when we look at the facts. Brunei exports mainly oil and petroleum products, which account for more than 95 per cent of its total exports, and almost the half of it goes to Japan and other sizeable parts to South Korea and Australia. Brunei is not a significant source of oil for the US as it does not import any oil or related products from Brunei.

Therefore, a TPP membership for Brunei makes, at present, only economic sense when Japan joins the group. In terms of open access to TPP markets for Brunei companies other than oil businesses, especially small and medium enterprises might find it convenient in the future to be able to venture into other countries with no trade barriers or other obstacles. However, the current non-oil trade of Brunei is so vanishingly low that it will be hard to measure a positive effect of a TPP membership in the mid-term.

Do you think that Brunei’s membership in a future Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade zone will help Brunei to diversify its economy? Will the advantages outweigh some of the mentioned negative aspects? Let us know through Twitter: @insideinvestor

 

This comment is part of Inside Investor’s weekly column series in Brunei’s leading newspaper Brunei Times and is published every Monday.

brunei_times_logo

 

Do you like this post?
  • Fascinated
  • Happy
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Bored
  • Afraid